_ 我不会分析我的盲目做法,当然要突破 5。5 的魔咒是很难的!_
1 \。foreign films
Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
范文: It is true that foreign films are more popular in many countries than domestically produced films。 There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that governments should promote local film-making by subsidising the industry。 There are various reasons why many people find foreign films more enjoyable than the films produced in their own countries。 Firstly, the established film industries in certain countries have huge budgets for action, special effects and to shoot scenes in spectacular locations。Hollywood blockbusters like 'Avatar' or the James Bond films are examples of such productions and the global appeal that they have。 Another reason why these big-budget films are so successful is that they often star the most famous actors and actresses, and they are made by the most accomplished producers and directors。 The poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries suffers in comparison。 In my view, governments should support local film industries financially。 In every country, there may be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves。 To compete with big-budget productions from overseas, these people need money to pay for film crews, actors and a host of other costs related to producing high-quality films。 If governments did help with these costs, they would see an increase in employment in the film industry, income from film sales, and perhaps even a rise in tourist numbers。 New Zealand, for example, has seen an increase in tourism related to the 'Lord of the Rings' films, which were partly funded by government subsidies。 In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films and allow them to compete with the foreign productions that currently dominate the market。
2 \。foreign tourists
Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions。 To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
范文: It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments。 I completely disagree with this idea。 The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system。 However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view。 Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel。 The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them。 If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday。 To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul 's Cathedral。 These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation 's cultural heritage。 If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings。 In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents。
Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
范文: People have different views about whether we are more or less dependent on others nowadays. In my view, modern life forces us to be more independent than people were in the past. There are two main reasons why it could be argued that we are more dependent on each other now. Firstly, life is more complex and difficult, especially because the cost of living has increased so dramatically. For example, young adults tend to rely on their parents for help when buying a house. Property prices are higher than ever, and without help it would be impossible for many people to pay a deposit and a mortgage. Secondly, people seem to be more ambitious nowadays, and they want a better quality of life for their families. This means that both parents usually need to work full-time, and they depend on support from grandparents and babysitters for child care. However, I would agree with those who believe that people are more independent these days. In most countries, families are becoming smaller and more dispersed, which means that people cannot count on relatives as much as they used to. We also have more freedom to travel and live far away from our home towns. For example, many students choose to study abroad instead of going to their local university, and this experience makes them more independent as they learn to live alone. Another factor in this growing independence is technology, which allows us to work alone and from any part of the world. In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that people now depend on each other more, my own view is that we are more independent than ever.